Daniil Glinka vs Alfredo Perez Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Daniil Glinka shows a slight edge in second serve performance, winning 46.29% of points compared to Alfredo Perez's 43.47%. Could this give Glinka an advantage?
• In return games, Perez excels, winning 47.55% of opponents' second serve points, while Glinka wins 42.98%, hinting at Perez's stronger return abilities.
• First serve return stats favor Perez, who wins 26.82% compared to Glinka's 25.04%, possibly suggesting stronger overall return capabilities.
• Both players perform similarly under pressure, with Perez slightly better at saving breakpoints (51.39% for Perez vs. 50.48% for Glinka).
• Recent form shows Glinka with a better win record (70.67% vs. 63.86%), reflecting greater consistency over the past year.
• Playing surface preferences highlight Glinka's strength on indoor hard courts with 60% win rate, while Perez prefers clay with a 60% win rate there.
• Glinka has excelled in Challengers/ITF > $10K events, winning 67.50% of matches, surpassing Perez's 58.82% win rate in similar events. Does this show Glinka's higher performance level?
• Glinka has faced lower-ranked opponents on average (rank 405.59), whereas Perez's opponents have been better ranked at an average of 358.87.
• In deciding sets, Perez has a slight upper hand with a 59% win rate, compared to Glinka's 54%, indicating resilience if matches reach a third set.

Editorial Prediction (November 6, 2025, UTC):

In analyzing the upcoming tennis match between Daniil Glinka and Alfredo Perez, several key factors come into play. Glinka's slightly superior second serve performance may provide him with a marginal yet crucial edge as this aspect often correlates with match success.

However, Alfredo Perez's stronger return game statistics suggest he could neutralize Glinka's serve advantage, especially given his higher win rates on both opponents' first and second serves. This strength forms a critical part of Perez's competitive arsenal against Glinka.

Looking at surface preferences, Glinka tends to perform better on indoor hard courts, whereas Perez prefers clay. Current event surface and conditions could significantly influence the outcome.

While Glinka displays better recent form, dominating slightly in matches won over the past year, Perez has consistently faced off against better-ranked opponents, showcasing his capability to challenge higher-level competition.

In matches extending to a deciding set, Perez’s superior record may provide him with the confidence needed to overcome Glinka. Nevertheless, predicting outcomes hinges on more than retrospective performance; current event momentum and form should be heavily weighed.

Based on these statistics and the broader tactics each player can employ, Alfredo Perez is slightly favored to win this upcoming match, primarily due to his return prowess and ability to perform under pressure.